In my 10 or so years in the startup community there have been a number of cities trying to make a name for themselves as startup hubs, most notably (in alphabetical order): Austin, Boise, Boston, Boulder, Chicago, NYC and Seattle. So how do these rank, and how do you make a city that wants to be a startup hub successful as one?
Austin has had a number of recent IPOs, including: Bazaarvoice (about to file), Convio ($200M mkt cap), Demand Media ($1B mkt cap), Freescale Semiconductor ($4B mkt cap), Homeaway ($3.25B mkt cap), Netspend ($800M mkt cap), Newgistics (on file), Solarwinds ($1.65B mkt cap), and Whiteglove (on file). With recent IPOs having a combined mkt cap north of $10B, I think it’s fair to say Austin is the biggest startup hub between the coasts.
Boise isn’t even on the map.
Boston has long been #2 to the Bay Area, anchored by Harvard and MIT and the many VC funds based there. Known for hardware and enterprise software, and more recently clean tech, Boston also has a growing web startup scene anchored by HubSpot. NYC, only 3 hours away, is now challenging Boston as the East Coast’s biggest startup hub.
Techstars and Brad Feld have put Boulder on the map, but you have to squint your eyes to see it. After some lightweight Google searches, I couldn’t find a single IPO (has there ever been one?), and only one recent startup exit north of $100 million, and it was a company based in Douglas County.
Chicago (in which I was a panelist at this week’s Techweek) has been riding Groupon’s coattails and is quickly making a name for itself as a startup hub. Chicago has a short but growing list of VC funds, and the wealth created by Groupon’s up coming IPO will certainly expand this list. Groupon’s mkt cap is anticipated to be north of $20B, double all of Austin’s IPOs combined.
NYC has seen an incredible influx of capital and growth in the number of startups over the last few years as capital and talent moved out of Wall St. and in to the startup scene. It is now neck and neck with Boston as #2 behind the Bay Area.
Seattle has had huge successes with Microsoft and Amazon which have long supported a healthy startup ecosystem.
So what makes a great startup hub? There is a chicken and the egg problem for sure, but I think capital is what drives it. Capital doesn’t really get on planes. Startups do when necessary. And talent will go wherever it has the most potential upside. There is an old joke that Sequoia only invests in companies it can drive to board meetings to within 30 minutes. This driving range doesn’t even extend to San Francisco. Silicon Valley reigns supreme, and will so long as Sand Hill Road is lined with VCs. The other startup hubs need to create and redistribute wealth, and fight tooth and nail to get more capital on the plane.